Jacobs v. Bd. of Supervisors of S.F.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
On March 27, 1893, the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco passed an order—designated as Order No. 2622—fixing the rates of compensation to be collected by any person or corporation furnishing water for family uses, for private persons, and for municipal and public purposes, during the year commencing July 1, 1893, pursuant to section *1251 of article XIV of the state constitution. The clerk of said board of supervisors presented said order to the mayor of said city and county, who refused to approve the same; and on April 7, 1893, he returned it to the board with a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spring Valley Water Works v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Reed v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Contra Costa Water Co. v. BreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.