Legal Opinion
Muller v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 1959No. Civ. 18377PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGLER, J. pro tem. *
From three unsuccessful attempts to interject himself into the instant action, William Muller, plaintiff’s former husband, in propria persona, has appealed. He also appeals from an order denying “inspection and copying” of an alleged deposition and other documents. Since appellant was never a party to the action the foundation for his motion to inspect was entirely lacking and because the order denying same is nonappealable (Code Civ. Proc., § 963) it will not be discussed.
The instant action (San Mateo County No. 79309) to quiet title to certain realty was commenced by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Peters v. BinnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Morrow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Crofton v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Hausmann v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. GerlachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- City & County of San Francisco v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- City of San Diego v. Otay Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.