Legal Opinion

Peters v. Binnard

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12697PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The above two cases, over the protests of appellants, were consolidated by the trial court and a single judgment rendered therein, from which judgment this appeal has been taken. The facts developed at the time of the trial are as follows:

In the year 1928 one Louisa G. Wood was the owner of four promissory notes aggregating $24,200 secured by deeds of trust on certain pieces of real property, which notes had been executed by the Peters-Rhoades Company as maker. Peters, respondent in both actions, owned substantially all of the stock in this company.

On April 3,-1928, Mrs. Wood…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Armstrong v. Lassen Lumber & Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GreenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Nyberg v. KirbyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Farnsworth v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Lerma v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API