Peters v. Binnard
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above two cases, over the protests of appellants, were consolidated by the trial court and a single judgment rendered therein, from which judgment this appeal has been taken. The facts developed at the time of the trial are as follows:
In the year 1928 one Louisa G. Wood was the owner of four promissory notes aggregating $24,200 secured by deeds of trust on certain pieces of real property, which notes had been executed by the Peters-Rhoades Company as maker. Peters, respondent in both actions, owned substantially all of the stock in this company.
On April 3,-1928, Mrs. Wood…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Armstrong v. Lassen Lumber & Box Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GreenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Nyberg v. KirbyNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Farnsworth v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Lerma v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.