Legal Opinion
Morrow v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 1935No. Civ. 1725PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition based upon the contention that the respondent court is without jurisdiction to proceed with the trial of a case pending therein until another party, the Medallion Oil Company, is brought in as a defendant.
*18Petitioners herein are the plaintiffs in the action referred to, which was begun in 1931. The defendants therein are the successors in interest of W. H. Oehsner. The complaint therein alleged that the plaintiffs, or in some instances the predecessors of certain plaintiffs, were in 1910 the owners and in possession of certain placer mining…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Moran v. SturgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Harkrader v. WadleySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- French v. HaySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- California Water Service Co. v. Edward Sidebotham & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.