Legal Opinion
Hausmann v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 6, 1963No. Civ. 26860PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Leave of court having been granted ex parte, Farmers Insurance Exchange filed its complaint in intervention some three months after its insured, Mr. Hausmann, had instituted an action against the defendants Gattenio for personal injuries to himself and his family as well as property damage to his automobile. An answer to Farmers’ pleading was filed by the Gattenios. The Hausmanns, however, demurred to the complaint in intervention upon the ground that no cause of action was therein stated; they also moved to strike the proposed pleading. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Offer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Socialist Workers 1974 California Campaign Committee v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Deutschmann v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Continental Vinyl Products Corp. v. Mead Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.