Landmark Land Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HODGES, Judge.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the United States breached its contracts with certain financial institutions when it enacted the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). United States v. Winstar Corporation, 518 U.S. 839, 843, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). FIRREA affected a number of financial institutions, many of which have cases pending in this court to determine damages. The breach in Landmark’s instance arises in connection with a 1982 agreement by which Landmark took over a failing thrift from the Government by contributing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- C. Sanchez and Son, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Arizona ex rel. Arizona Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Centex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.