Legal Opinion

Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 22, 1965No. 199-60PublishedCited by 308 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was referred pursuant to former Rule 45(a) (now Rule 57(a)) to Trial Commissioner Herbert N. Maletz, with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for a conclusion of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on July 10, 1963. The plaintiff has excepted to the opinion and certain of the findings of fact. The parties have filed briefs and the case has been argued orally. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s findings, his opinion and his recommended conclusion of law, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby adopts the same as the basis for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Finn v. MeighanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by308 opinions

  1. The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Metric Constructors, Inc. v. National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. C. Sanchez and Son, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Andersen Consulting v. The United States, and Computer Sciences Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

303 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API