Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— In March 1998, Alirio Medina and Ernestina Fuentes (Medina) filed a complaint seeking dam*307ages for Medina’s personal injury claim against Public Utility District No. 1 of Benton County (County) and Fuentes’ derivative claim for loss of consortium. The County moved for summary judgment, arguing that Medina failed to comply with the provisions of RCW 4.96.020(4) by filing four days before the statutory waiting period expired. Initially the Benton County Superior Court denied the motion but upon reconsideration issued an order granting the County summary judgment and dismissing the case. In an…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- M.W. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Troxell v. RAINIER PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Troxell v. Rainier Public School District No. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.