Legal Opinion

Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. Doe

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 1993No. 92-351PublishedCited by 1,998 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

In the Commonwealth of Kentucky, involuntary civil commitments of those alleged to be mentally retarded and of those alleged to be mentally ill are governed by separate statutory procedures. Two differences between these commitment proceedings are at issue in this case. First, at *315a final commitment hearing, the applicable burden of proof for involuntary commitment based on mental retardation is clear and convincing evidence, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §202B. 160(2) (Michie 1991), while the standard for involuntary commitment based on mental illness is beyond a reasonable doubt, § 202A.076(2).…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,998 opinions

  1. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Adrian King, Jr. v. Jim RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  5. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

1,993 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API