Legal Opinion

State v. Thorne

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1996No. 63413-1PublishedCited by 322 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Guy, J. —

Background

Defendant James M. Thorne challenges the constitution*746ality of the Persistent Offender Accountability Act, commonly known as the "three strikes and you’re out” law. We find the law to be constitutional.

In November 1993, the voters of the state of Washington were asked in Initiative 593 to decide the question:

Shall criminals who are convicted of "most serious, offenses” on three occasions be sentenced to life in prison without parole?

Seventy-six percent of the voters of this state answered "yes” to this question.

Initiative 593, titled the "Persistent Offender Accountability…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by322 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999

317 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API