F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. Virginia
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
Plaintiff in error is a corporation created by and existing under the laws of Virginia, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling commercial fertilizers. It operates a manufacturing plant in the County of Norfolk in that State and several plants in other States. From the operation of its plant in Virginia it made net profits during the year ending December 31, 1916, amounting in round figures to $260,000; and from the operation of its plants in other States during the same year made net profits amounting to about $270,000. Under the revenue law of *413the State (Act of April 16, 1903,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Keeney v. Comptroller of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Citizens' Telephone Co. of Grand Rapids v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,223 opinions
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
1,218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.