Legal Opinion

Troxell v. Rainier Public School District No. 307

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2005No. 74986-8PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 RCW 4.96.020(4) forbids the commencement of a tort action against a local government defendant “until sixty days have elapsed after” the plaintiff files a claim notice with the local government entity. We must *348determine whether a plaintiff strictly complies with the statutorily prescribed “sixty-day period” if only 59 full calendar days intervene between the day the notice is filed and the day the legal action is commenced. Consistent with the general rule applicable to the computation of waiting periods, we hold that, by its plain language, RCW 4.96.020(4) requires that 60 calendar days…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. VelaWashington Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rivas v. Overlake Hosp. Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re Personal Restraint of DallugeWashington Supreme Court · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API