Legal Opinion
G Eorge R. T Heiss v. Anthony J. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided July 27, 2004No. 01-0906PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. KRAMER, Chief Judge, filed a concurring opinion.
GREENE, Judge:
Veteran George R. Theiss appeals, through counsel, an April 6, 2001, decision *206by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that determined that he was not entitled to additional non-service-connected pension benefits for dependents under section 1521(c) of title 38, U.S.Code, for his 18-year-old son, who was attending a State-of-Wisconsin-approved home school. Record (R.) at 6. The Board found that Mr. Theiss’s son was not a “child” as defined by section 101(4)(A)(iii) of title 38,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Price v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Gary D. Bradley v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
- Joseph Martinak v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Jonathan L. Haas v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Faunda R. Hatch v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.