Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided February 22, 2001No. 99-1788PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Chief Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. STEINBERG, Judge, filed a concurring opinion.
KRAMER, Chief Judge:
The appellant appealed pro se a September 30, 1999, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) that denied increased VA disability ratings for his service-connected sensory impairment and hyperesthesia with trigeminal nerve damage, residuals of a fracture of the left orbital floor, sinusitis, diplopia, and laceration of the left upper eyelid. Record (R.) at 4, 19. On October 12, 2000, the Court, in a single-judge memorandum decision, affirmed the BVA decision.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Larry A. Pelegrini v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- Quartuccio v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- L IZZIE K. M AY FIELD v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Charles v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Livesay v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.