Legal Opinion

O'Toole v. Denihan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2008No. 2007-0056PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} In the case before us, we are asked to determine whether appellants Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services (“CCDCFS”), Tallis George-Munro, Kamesha Duncan, and William Denihan are entitled to immunity in their handling of the case of Sydney Sawyer, a child who died from abuse. For the reasons that follow, we hold that they are.

{¶ 2} First, a public children services agency and its employees, upon receipt of a case referral, do not have a duty under R.C. 2151.421(A)(1)(a) to cross-report the case to a law-enforcement agency and are immune from liability for failing to *375…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Argabrite v. NeerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Lambert v. ClancyOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Smathers v. GlassOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Maternal Grandmother v. Hamilton Cty. Dept. of Job & Family Servs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API