O'Toole v. Denihan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} In the case before us, we are asked to determine whether appellants Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services (“CCDCFS”), Tallis George-Munro, Kamesha Duncan, and William Denihan are entitled to immunity in their handling of the case of Sydney Sawyer, a child who died from abuse. For the reasons that follow, we hold that they are.
{¶ 2} First, a public children services agency and its employees, upon receipt of a case referral, do not have a duty under R.C. 2151.421(A)(1)(a) to cross-report the case to a law-enforcement agency and are immune from liability for failing to *375…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Thompson v. McNeillOhio Supreme Court · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Argabrite v. NeerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Lambert v. ClancyOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Smathers v. GlassOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Maternal Grandmother v. Hamilton Cty. Dept. of Job & Family Servs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.