Legal Opinion

Baker v. Reed

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1998No. 97-274PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Appellants seek reversal of the district court’s order enforcing a $30,500.00 promissory note in favor of the Joan Reed Trust and ordering appellants to pay an additional $24,320.76. Appellants, appearing before this court pro se, have failed to comply with W.R.A.P. 7.01. Therefore, we summarily affirm the district court’s order and grant ap-pellees’ request for sanctions pursuant to W.R.A.P. 10.05.

I. ISSUES

We decline to address the eleven issues set out by appellants. It is apparent that appellants’ only real complaint is that the district judge found in favor of appellees.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Amen, Inc. v. BarnardWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Welch v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Basolo v. GoseWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dorsett v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of William G. Bratton, Ward, Robert E. BrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Small v. Convenience Plus Partners, Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API