Legal Opinion

Hamburg v. Heilbrun

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. 94-78PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

In this case which is presented by A1 Hamburg (Hamburg), acting as his own attorney, the primary issue is the failure of Hamburg to present cogent argument and pertinent authority in his brief as well as his failure to comply with Wyo.R.App.P. 7.01. The issue asserted by Hamburg is that he had a right to participate as a party in a case presented by his sons in the trial court. There are incidental issues relating to an attempt to exercise peremptory challenge of the judge and a motion to stay proceedings, but the consideration of those issues depends upon the resolution of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. England v. SimmonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Amrein v. Wyoming Livestock BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Haderlie v. SondgerothWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stadtfeld v. StadtfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Boyd v. NationWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. May v. MayWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Seherr-Thoss v. Seherr-ThossWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. MSC v. MCGWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API