Legal Opinion

Small v. Convenience Plus Partners, Ltd.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2000No. 99-278PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Larry Small appeals from the trial court's conclusion that he failed to prove his contract with Appellee Convenience Plus Partners, Ltd. was unconscionable.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Small submits the following three issues for our analysis:

A.) Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it did not void the contract where the Appellee substantially breached the duty of good faith and fair dealing implied in the contract?

B.) Did the District Court abuse its discretion when it held that the contract was not unconscionable where the clauses of the contract were so one-sided as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. DietzWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Baker v. ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Parker v. ParkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re" H" ChildrenWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. DH v. Wyoming Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Orcutt v. Shober Investments, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In the Interest of: BFW, a Minor Child, DW and KW v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API