Arnold v. Adventure Line Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment imposing liability against an insurance company under a general comprehensive liability insurance policy. The primary question is whether an exclusionary clause in the policy eliminated coverage for a fire loss of hand tools owned and used by employees of the insured. The plant of the insured was destroyed by fire. The exclusionary clause is one generally referred to as a “care, custody or control clause”.
First a brief summary of background facts should be given. The employer, Adventure Line Manufacturing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A. T. Morris & Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Buchanan v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Stewart v. Preferred Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Kirchner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Herrman v. FolkertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scott E. McIntosh and Steven R. McIntosh v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Wiles v. American Family Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- City of Salina, Kan. v. Maryland Cas. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Caisson Corp. v. Home Indemnity Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Eisenbarth v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.