Legal Opinion
Scott E. McIntosh and Steven R. McIntosh v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1993No. 92-3164PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
In this garnishment action, Scott McIntosh and his father, Steven McIntosh, appeal from a district court order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Scottsdale”) its motion for summary judgment. The district court held that Scottsdale does not owe the City of Wichita, Kansas (“Wichita”) coverage for a tort judgment that the Mclntoshes won against Wichita. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
This case arose when Scott McIntosh suffered injuries from a fall on the premises of Wichita’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Buell Cabinet Company, Inc. v. SudduthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Evanston Insurance Co. v. ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Merchants Insurance Co. of New Hampshire, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Swift Energy Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Acceptance Insurance v. Syufy EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- McCarthy Bros. Co. v. Continental Lloyds Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.