Caisson Corp. v. Home Indemnity Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buckley
The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court properly found that exclusionary clauses contained in an insurance policy issued by defendant, Home Indemnity Corporation, rendered defendant not liable for damage to a concrete pumping truck which plaintiff used to pour bridge caissons. For the following reasons, we affirm.
A brief summary of the facts is as follows. On November 17, 1981, plaintiff, Caisson Corporation, an Illinois corporation engaged in the business of constructing concrete foundations, was involved in a bridge construction project in Phoenix, Arizona.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Carruthers v. B. C. Christopher & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Boswell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Weiss v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Alderman v. Hanover Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Specialty Coatings Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Nationwide Insurance v. Central Laborers' Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Sentry Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Zurich InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.