Herrman v. Folkerts
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hatcher, C.:
This appeal stems from a controversy over the application of an exclusionary clause in a liability insurance policy.
The facts are very limited. It would appear that there was a stipulation as to the facts in the court below which was not made a part of the record on appeal. We must, therefore, consider the facts as stated by the trial court in its memorandum opinion as follows:
“The facts, as briefly as this Court can state them, are that the insurance company had issued a regular farm liability policy of insurance to the defendant Folkerts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walt Keeler Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Richardson Gas & Oil Co. v. City of AltoonaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
3Cited by11 opinions
- Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Pfeiffer v. Grocers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. ParrishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mendoza v. Rivera-ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. v. Farmers Elevator, Inc. of Grace CityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.