Legal Opinion

Herrman v. Folkerts

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1968No. 45,153PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

This appeal stems from a controversy over the application of an exclusionary clause in a liability insurance policy.

The facts are very limited. It would appear that there was a stipulation as to the facts in the court below which was not made a part of the record on appeal. We must, therefore, consider the facts as stated by the trial court in its memorandum opinion as follows:

“The facts, as briefly as this Court can state them, are that the insurance company had issued a regular farm liability policy of insurance to the defendant Folkerts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walt Keeler Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Richardson Gas & Oil Co. v. City of AltoonaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pfeiffer v. Grocers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. ParrishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Mendoza v. Rivera-ChavezWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. v. Farmers Elevator, Inc. of Grace CityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API