Legal Opinion

Eisenbarth v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1992No. 91-230PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant Dennis Eisenbarth (Eisen-barth) sought to recover damages from his insurer, appellee Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford). Hartford determined that its farm-ranch policy excluded coverage for damages arising from the death of cattle which were pastured in Eisenbarth’s corn field. The policy excluded coverage for damage to property which was in Eisen-barth’s “care, custody or control.” The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Hartford, and Eisenbarth seeks review of that order.

We reverse and remand with instructions that the summary judgment for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Worthington v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McKay v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ricci v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. StamperWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. American Family Mut. Ins. Company v. BentleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. PFZ Properties, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  2. Sinclair Oil Corp. v. Republic Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roemer Oil Co. v. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mcmillin Homes Constr., Inc. v. Nat'l Fire & Marine Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Maher Bros., Inc. v. Quinn Pork, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API