Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 2012No. COA12-269PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

Keith Antonio Barnett (“Defendant”) appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of failing to notify the sheriffs office of change of address as required for a registered sex offender under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.9. The indictment in this case failed to specify that Defendant was “a person required to register,” an essential element of the charged offense. This defect rendered the indictment insufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction upon the trial court, and we must therefore arrest the trial court’s judgment and vacate Defendant’s conviction.

I. Factual &…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. AbshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. FurrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API