Legal Opinion

State v. Furr

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 2015No. COA14–1004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the indictment charges an offense based on the language of the statute and puts defendant on reasonable notice of those charges, the indictment is not defective and is sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon the trial court. Where defendant fails to meet his burden to show trial counsel made errors so serious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial, defendant cannot prevail on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

On 10 June 2013, in Cleveland County Superior Court, defendant Christopher Lee Furr-a registered sex offender-was indicted for failing to report a new…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. AbshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API