Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 2016No. 65PA15PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Justice.

Defendant Keith Antonio Barnett was convicted of violating the sex offender registration laws and resisting, delaying, and obstructing a public officer. A unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals vacated defendant’s sex offender registration conviction. We now reverse that decision of the Court of Appeals.

Defendant is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to the North Carolina Sex Offender and Public Protection Registration Program because of a 1997 felony conviction for taking indecent liberties with a child. On 6 January 2010, defendant pleaded guilty to and was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. AbshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. PickensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. PhachoumphoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. State v. Brantley-PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API