Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1972No. 34PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Before pleading to the charge defendant moved to quash certain language in the bill of indictment, specifically the words “not having the fear of God before his eyes, but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the devil”; and also the word “wickedly” near the end of the bill. Denial of his motion constitutes defendant’s first assignment of error.

An indictment is “a written accusation of a crime drawn up by the public prosecuting attorney and submitted to the grand jury, and by them found and presented on oath or affirmation as a true bill.” State v. Thomas, 236 N.C.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API