Legal Opinion

State v. McLamb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 2015No. 15-39PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCULLOUGH, Judge.

*486 Jimmie Rodgers McLamb ("defendant") appeals from judgment entered upon his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. On appeal, defendant contends that the indictment was insufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction upon the trial court. For the following reasons, we find no error.

I. Background

On 13 June 2007, defendant pleaded guilty to sexual battery in violation of N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-27.5A(a) in Duplin County Superior Court. As a result of this conviction, defendant was required to register as a sex offender under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 14-208.7 et seq.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. McKoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API