Legal Opinion

State v. James

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 2015No. COA15–21PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*873DAVIS, Judge.

*189Richard Darnell James ("Defendant") appeals from his convictions for failure to report a change of address as a sex offender and attaining the status of an habitual felon. On appeal, he contends that (1) his indictment was fatally flawed; (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss; and (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. After careful review, we conclude that Defendant received a fair trial free from error and dismiss his appeal in part.

Factual Background

The State presented evidence at trial tending to establish the following facts: On 10 September…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. HaseldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. WynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. RedfearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API