Legal Opinion

United States v. Cano

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 26, 2005No. 04-0291/ARPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE CASE OF UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Arturo CANO, Specialist U.S. Army, Appellant No. 04-0291 Crim. App. No. 20010086 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued December 7, 2004 Decided April 26, 2005 ERDMANN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GIERKE, C.J., and EFFRON and BAKER, JJ., joined. CRAWFORD, J., filed a separate opinion concurring in the result. Counsel For Appellant: Captain Todd N. George (argued); Colonel Mark Cremin, Colonel Robert D. Teetsel, Lieutenant Colonel Mark Tellitocci, Major Sean S. Park, and Captain Lonnie J. McAllister II (on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. HartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. SantosCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API