Legal Opinion

Aetna Life Insurance v. Chandler

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 24, 1937PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

It is the general rule that a bailee “has no right to delegate his power of user unless there is some understanding or agreement to that effect.” 6 C. J. 1115. But a use “required by reasonable necessity” may sometimes be inferred from the terms of the bailment although not specifically included therein. Evans v. Mason, 64 N. H. 98, 99.

The trial court in the present case has found that the bailor permitted the bailee the reasonable use of the car for the bailee’s needs, that the bailee had an urgent need for the car on the night of the accident, and that the use made of it was reasonable;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  2. Travelers Insurance v. GreenoughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Sauriolle v. O'GormanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  4. Morin v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  5. Evans v. MasonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Varble Ex Rel. Varble v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Hays v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gibbs v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. Costanzo v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API