Legal Opinion

Morin v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 3, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The plaintiff claims that she will be denied her day in court if she is not permitted to go to trial, and says that the trial court had no right to issue orders in advance of the trial to ascertain what the evidence would be. The court had general charge over the action and its jurisdiction is undoubted, even if the procedure was unusual and irregular. In Hughes v. Railroad, 71 N. H. 279, a nonsuit was held properly ordered on the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel, and in Burleigh v. Leun, 83 N. H. 115, an order for determining a main issue of liability in connection with a collateral…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Genest v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  2. Carpenter v. HatchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  3. Hughes v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  4. Chesley v. DunkleeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  5. Burleigh v. Wong Soon LeunSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Beatty v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  4. White Mountain Cable Construction Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Belas v. MelanovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API