Morin v. Travelers Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiff claims that she will be denied her day in court if she is not permitted to go to trial, and says that the trial court had no right to issue orders in advance of the trial to ascertain what the evidence would be. The court had general charge over the action and its jurisdiction is undoubted, even if the procedure was unusual and irregular. In Hughes v. Railroad, 71 N. H. 279, a nonsuit was held properly ordered on the opening statement of plaintiff’s counsel, and in Burleigh v. Leun, 83 N. H. 115, an order for determining a main issue of liability in connection with a collateral…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Genest v. Odell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
- Carpenter v. HatchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
- Hughes v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Chesley v. DunkleeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Burleigh v. Wong Soon LeunSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Beatty v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Aetna Life Insurance v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- White Mountain Cable Construction Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Belas v. MelanovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.