Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Dunlap

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 3, 1930PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

I. The case is presented here in part upon evidence produced at the trial and in part upon offers of proof. At the close of the testimony, the motion for a nonsuit was made and the plaintiff was permitted to make the first offer of additional proof. The motion was then granted subject to exception. About a week later, the plaintiff was given leave to make a further offer of proof. The defendant excepted, and now claims that the last offer of proof cannot be considered here. The objection is not well taken. The case was still within the control of the superior court, and there was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Roller v. RollerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McKelvey v. McKelveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API