Legal Opinion

Hays v. Country Mutual Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1963No. 37722PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

This case turns upon the meaning and application of the “omnibus clause” of a policy of automobile liability insurance, which extends coverage to other persons in addition to the named insured. The plaintiff suffered personal injuries when the automobile in which she was a passenger struck a culvert. She sued the driver, Thomas Hargis, and recovered a judgment for $11,267.50. She then commenced this action upon the judgment against the defendant, Country Mutual Insurance Company, claiming that the driver, Hargis, was an additional insured within the terms of a policy of insurance issued to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Konrad v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Landis Ex Rel. Talley v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  5. Norris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Clemmons v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. PothsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Helmkamp v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API