Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Spotts
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1932No. Docket No. 633PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action for damages brought by Milford W. Dahl, a minor, through his guardian ad litem, against Charles Spotts and Pernel Barnett for injuries received while he was riding as a guest of Spotts in a Ford delivery truck.. Barnett was the owner of the truck. The jury returned a verdict for $2,500 in favor of the minor, from which this appeal is taken, as well as from an order denying motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
Spotts was the distributing agent for the “Liberty Magazine” in certain parts of Orange County. On July 9, 1930, he took respondent and several other boys…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Malone v. ClemowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Tieman v. Red Top Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Alloggi v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Perry v. A. Paladini, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Freitas v. Peerless Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Hagy v. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Oder v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- People v. MarkhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Lufkin v. Patten-Blinn Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.