Legal Opinion

Alloggi v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1918No. Civ. No. 2314PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

At about 10 o’clock in the evening of September 19, 1913, the plaintiff, Achille Alloggi, and his wife, Leonie Alloggi, while riding in their automobile along San Salvador Street, in the county of Santa Clara, attempted to cross a spur-track leading from the right of way of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company into the yards of the Peninsular Railway Company, and in so doing the automobile which the plaintiff was driving came into collision with one of a train of several flat cars that was being switched by the defendant, the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, across San Salvador Street and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hutson v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Keena v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. New York Lubricating Oil Co. v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API