Legal Opinion

Perry v. A. Paladini, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1928No. Docket No. 6224PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought action against defendants to recover for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by him through the negligence of defendants. In the court below plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant A. Paladini, Inc., a corporation, and from this judgment said defendant presents the appeal. Included in the review is the lower court’s order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The question here presented centers about the liability of appellant corporation. For the purposes hereof certain facts are conceded. It is admitted that plaintiff did…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People v. ArgentosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Market Street Railway Co. v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Bushnell v. Yoshika TashiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API