Legal Opinion
Echo Four v. Hill
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 8, 1985No. 2607PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The defendants, George W. Hill, the building and zoning inspector for the town of Darien, the planning and zoning commission, the zoning board of appeals, and the town itself, appeal from the trial court’s judgment of mandamus ordering Hill to issue a certificate of occupancy permitting Pitney Bowes Credit Corporation (PBCC) to occupy the plaintiff’s premises in Darien under a lease, and also declaring certain sections of the town’s zoning regulations invalid.
There is no dispute about the underlying facts. On April 1,1982, the plaintiff, Echo Four, a partnership, applied to Hill for a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Corthouts v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Coombs v. LarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Milford Education Assn. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pierce v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Cristofaro v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- City of Norwich v. Norwalk Wilbert Vault Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- D'Amico v. WillisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- L & G Associates, Inc. V. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.