Cristofaro v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The defendant Burlington planning and zoning commission (commission) denied the plaintiffs application for a three lot subdivision of his property on the ground that the proposed lots failed to meet the requirement of its subdivision regulations that all lots proposed for subdivision measure at least one acre.1 The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court, where the commission’s action was upheld and the appeal dismissed. Certification to appeal to this court was sub*261sequently granted. The plaintiffs sole claim of error is that a planning and zoning commission, acting in its capacity as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Coombs v. LarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- State v. McIverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bombero v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Cristofaro v. Town of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Samperi v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Bombero v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. One 1981 BMW AutomobileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.