Legal Opinion

D'Amico v. Willis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 29, 1987No. 4762PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The defendant chief of police for the city of New Britain appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting a writ of mandamus. The plaintiff has been the full-time dog warden of the city of New Britain since 1976, and is a civilian member of the New Britain police department. In his appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in granting the writ of mandamus because (1) a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy available only in limited circumstances, (2) the plaintiff did not have a clear legal right to a writ of mandamus, (3) the defendant did not have a mandatory duty…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Wilson v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Milford Education Assn. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Monroe v. Middlebury Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. West Hartford Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riley v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. D'Amico v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Message Ctr. Beepers v. Pub. Util. Ctrl., No. Cv 95 055 50 89 (May 30, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  4. Waterbury v. WatertownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API