L & G Associates, Inc. V. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in an action in which *13the plaintiff sought a judgment declaring that a 1978 use variance applied to its property. The trial court determined that a use variance granted by the defendant did not permit the plaintiff to construct a building on its property for business, banking or professional purposes but allowed the property to be used only incidentally to the construction of a commercial building on another parcel of land in accordance with the site plan filed with the original application for variances.
Our review of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Serrani v. Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Kolenberg v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Raymark Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Pierce v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Russo v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- L & G Associates, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Board of Education v. Town & Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, No. Cv97-0056880s (Aug. 29, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000