Legal Opinion

L & G Associates, Inc. V. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 1993No. 10627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in an action in which *13the plaintiff sought a judgment declaring that a 1978 use variance applied to its property. The trial court determined that a use variance granted by the defendant did not permit the plaintiff to construct a building on its property for business, banking or professional purposes but allowed the property to be used only incidentally to the construction of a commercial building on another parcel of land in accordance with the site plan filed with the original application for variances.

Our review of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Serrani v. Board of EthicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Kolenberg v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Raymark Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Pierce v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. Russo v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L & G Associates, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Board of Education v. Town & Borough of NaugatuckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Taft v. Wheelabrator Putnam, No. Cv97-0056880s (Aug. 29, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API