Legal Opinion

State v. Jordan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 1988No. C3-88-1385, C7-88-1387 and C8-88-1396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Appellant/petitioner Robert Jordan is charged with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn.Stat. § 609.342, allegedly committed against 10-year-old L.C. Jordan’s private investigator obtained a recantation statement, dated April 8, 1988, retracting L.C.’s allegations of sexual abuse. The trial court, however, did not allow L.C. to testify at the omnibus hearing, although Jordan claimed she was appearing voluntarily. The trial court denied Jordan’s motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause.

Jordan has not submitted a transcript…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. KvaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. State v. MontanoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. State v. VerscheldeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API