Legal Opinion
State v. Russell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1992No. C4-92-170PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Petitioner seeks discretionary review of an order denying his motion to dismiss an indictment. We deny the petition.
FACTS
Petitioner Russell has been indicted for first degree premeditated murder, first degree felony murder and second degree intentional murder. The charges result from police discovery of a dead body in a Minneapolis residence. Three co-defendants have also been indicted.
Minneapolis police entered the residence in response to an anonymous tip concerning the body. The state alleges that Russell consented to the entry and search. Russell has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. InthavongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- City of St. Louis Park v. EngellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. TerrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Welfare of A.N.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center v. Avera MarshallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Matter of AnjCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994