Legal Opinion
State v. Montano
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1989No. C2-89-352PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
PACTS
Petitioner Pablo Montano seeks discretionary review , of the trial court’s order denying his challenge to the constitutionality of the Minnesota prostitution laws, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.321-.324 (1988). Monta-no contends these statutes are a substantially overbroad intrusion into freedom of expression. Montano is a temporary resident who is charged with engaging in prostitution. Montano claims he would be in danger of deportation if convicted of that crime, even if his direct appeal were still pending. The trial court denied the motion to dismiss, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jesus Aguilera-Enriquez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Wegan v. Village of LexingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Leonel Morales-Alvarado v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Doe v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995