Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 2003No. C6-02-1808PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Appellants filed a petition for discretionary “appeal” of a pretrial order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint charging them with deprivation of parental rights. This court questioned jurisdiction because it appeared that no judgment of-conviction had been entered, but we gave appellants an opportunity to show why discretionary review should be granted. Because we conclude that appellants have not shown a compelling reason to grant discretionary review, we deny that request and dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

Appellants Cheryl Ann and Dean Smith…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. VerscheldeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. FitmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API