State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellants filed a petition for discretionary “appeal” of a pretrial order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint charging them with deprivation of parental rights. This court questioned jurisdiction because it appeared that no judgment of-conviction had been entered, but we gave appellants an opportunity to show why discretionary review should be granted. Because we conclude that appellants have not shown a compelling reason to grant discretionary review, we deny that request and dismiss the appeal.
FACTS
Appellants Cheryl Ann and Dean Smith…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. VerscheldeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. FitmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012