Legal Opinion
State v. Florence
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1976No. 46382PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Chief Justice.
I
In felony proceedings before the District Court of Ramsey County, defendant moved to dismiss the complaints on the ground that there was an insufficient showing of probable cause to believe that he had committed the offenses charged. The motion was denied, and defendant sought a writ of prohibition from this court. By order dated November 21, 1975, we denied the relief requested and indicated that this opinion would follow.
The district court based its denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss on the “entire record,” which included hearsay which would not have been…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- William D. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Joseph AmabileCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. SteinbuchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. DopplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.