Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 12, 1997No. C2-96-2542PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
Four companies involved in the three-dimensional photography business (“respondents”) sued Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (“3M”) in Texas state court seeking lost profits. The jury found that 3M breached express and implied warranties, and the trial court allowed the four respondents to recover one lump-sum damages award. The Texas Court of Appeals affirmed in all relevant respects, see Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Nishika Ltd., 885 S.W.2d 603, 636, 639 (Tex.Ct.App.1994) (“3M ”), but the Texas Supreme Court withheld judgment and certified two…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Nebraska Innkeepers, Inc. v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- Kinetic Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- City of Wyoming v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.