Legal Opinion

Kinetic Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 4, 2009No. 08-CV-6062 (JMR/AJB)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES M. ROSENBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff is a self-insured employer which pays its employees’ medical expenses. It seeks to represent a putative class of third-party payors (or “TPPs”) for medical services. Plaintiff also seeks reimbursement for medical expenses resulting from the recall of certain cardiac devices manufactured by defendant.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The motion is denied.

I. Background 1

Defendant, Medtronic, Inc. (“Medtronic”), manufactures medical devices, including implantable cardiac care devices. In January,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Bjc Health System v. Columbia Casualty Company, Atg Assurance Company Limited v. Columbia Casualty Company, Doing Business as Cna HealthproCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Thunanber v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  3. Khoday v. Symantec Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  4. Select Comfort Corp. v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  5. In re Polaris Mktg.District Court, D. Maine · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API