Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Midwest Security Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 20, 2003No. 02-2343PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
¶ 1. Midwest Security Insurance Company (Midwest) appeals from a declaratory judgment entitling Heather C. Fischer and her parents (the Fischers) to recover under the separate coverage limits of a Midwest policy with respect to uninsured motorist coverage (UM), underinsured motorist coverage (UIM), and medical payments coverage, up to the full extent of their actual damages. Midwest asserts that the insurance policy's limit on liability prohibits duplicate payments for the same elements of loss in a single accident. Midwest claims the trial court erred when it permitted the Fischers to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Gonzalez Ex Rel. Bichler v. City of FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Janssen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zarder Ex Rel. Menard v. Humana InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Ruenger v. SoodsmaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- Imre v. Lake States Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Berkeypile v. Westfield InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Imre v. Lake States Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.