Legal Opinion

Zarder Ex Rel. Menard v. Humana Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2010No. 2008AP919PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision affirming the circuit court's denial of Acuity's motion for declaratory judgment. Acuity sought a declaration that the accident here was not a hit-and-run accident under the terms of the uninsured motorist (UM) policy issued to James and Glory Zarder. The circuit court and court of appeals determined that Acuity was not entitled to a declaratory judgment even though the occupants of the vehicle that allegedly struck thirteen-year-old Zachary Zarder stopped to check on his wellbeing before departing.

¶…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. Patrick H. DaltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Wisconsin Justice Initiative, Inc. v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Siebert v. Wisconsin American Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Horizon Bank, National Association v. Marshalls Point Retreat LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API